The High Court of Rajasthan in a D.B. Civil Contempt Petition held that since the petitioner established compliance with prior directions, the respondents were not liable. The court dismissed the contempt petition and discharged the rule without proceeding with contempt proceedings.
Contempt petition dismissed; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
O R D E R
D.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.148/2014
Ram Kumar Versus
Shri R C Agarwal & Anr.
Date of Order :: 10.03.2015
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Mr. J.K. Kaushik for the petitioner Mr. Jagdish Vyas for the respondents
BY THE COURT :
Counsel for the petitioner submits that necessary compliance of the directions given by the order dated 10.07.2013 has already been made.
Having considered all facts of the case, we are not inclined to proceed against the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed. The rule issued is discharged.
[JAISHREE THAKUR], J. [GOV IND MATHUR], J.
Pramod
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court ought to have proceeded against the respondents for contempt given the alleged compliance of previous directions.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Kumar
Shri R C Agarwal & Anr.
Govind Mathur
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
