suits. In that case too, somewhat identical situation was obtaining. Therein, the first suit for declaration and injunction was filed on 08.08.2000 in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jodhpur. The second suit was filed by one Marwar Muslim Educational Society through its General Secretary, who was defendant in the earlier suit. In the second suit also, the prayer for declaration and injunction was made. Thereafter, a third suit was filed by one Mehar M. Sadique in the court of Additional District Judge after valuing the suit for more than Rs.50,000/-. In that suit too, relief of declaration and injunction was made. The argument that was raised before this court was that controversy involved in the second and third suit was directly and substantially same, therefore, they should await disposal of first suit. Even when there are different parties, still provisions of Section 10 of the Code of Civil procedure can be invoked and even proceedings of the suit can be stayed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. All the suits pertained to the same dispute relating to correctness of election of the members of management committee. The matter reached the High Court in revision petition filed by one Shabir Ahmed Khilji against the order refusing to pass injunction order in one of the suits. This Court in exercise of suo motu power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, ordered the Civil Original Suit No.78/2000 and Civil Original Suit No.62/2002 pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) No.1, Jodhpur, and in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) No.1, Jodhpur, respectively, to be withdrawn and transferred to the court of Additional District Judge No.3, Jodhpur, where the third suit was
