The High Court of Rajasthan permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition. The court directed Respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner's case on merits and dismissed the stay application.
Permission for withdrawal granted; direction to Respondent No.3 to decide on merits; stay application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5742/2015 Jagdish Prasad-Petitioner Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors.-Respondents.
Date of Order :: 15/05/2015
Hon 'ble Ms. J ust ic e Bela M. Trivedi
Mr. Dhruv Atri, for the petitioner.
ORDER
BY THE COURT :
(Bela M. Trivedi) J .
Sanjay Solanki PA13
“ All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” Sanjay Solanki Personal Assistant
2 issues framed by the court
Whether permission should be granted for withdrawal of the writ petition with directions to the respondent to decide the matter on merits.
What is the fate of the stay application when the main petition is withdrawn.
Jagdish Prasad
State of Rajasthan
Divisional Commissioner
Respondent No.3
Bela M. Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
