Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file representations before other High Courts. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition and associated stay application.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make representations to the respondents granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2584/ 2015
Madan Kumar-Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & Ors.-Respondents
Date of Order-: : -4th May, 2015
Hon ' ble Ms. Ju st ice Bela M. Tr iv edi
Mr. Arvind Bhardwaj, for petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to make representation to the respondents in the light of the contentions raised in the present petition as well as in the light of the interim orders passed at the High Court of Madras (Annexure-16) and at the High Court of Patna (Annexure-18). The permission as sought for is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn accordingly. By this order, the stay application also stands dismissed.
( Bela M. Tr ivedi) J.
R.Vaishnav 24.
“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” Ramesh Vaishnav-Personal Assistant
Madan Kumar
Union of India
Bela M. Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
