Allowed

Smt Kamlesh Sachdeva v. Rajender Prasad Gupta Anr.

Rajasthan HC8 Jan 2015CW/14566/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan ordered the Trial Court to decide the pending suit for specific performance expeditiously by year end, directing no unnecessary adjournments, considering the petitioner's prolonged delay in proof and residence in rented accommodation.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Trial Court to decide the matter expeditiously by the end of the year and no unnecessary adjournment on mere asking.

Smt Kamlesh Sachdeva Vs Rajender Prasad Gupta Anr. — Execution and Attachment | Rajasthan HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR

¶3

O R D E R

¶4

S. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 14566/ 2014

¶5

Smt . Kaml esh Sachdeva Vs.

¶6

Raj ender Pr asad Gupt a & Anr .

¶7

Dat e of Or der : 08/ 01/ 2015

¶8

HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE J. K. RANKA

¶9

Mr . Jai Raj Tant i a, f or t he pet i t i oner .

¶10

I n t hi s i nst ant wr i t pet i t i on f i l ed under Ar t i cl e 226 of t he const i t ut i on of I ndi a, t he f ol l owi ng pr ayer has been made by pet i t i oner .

¶11

“ ( i ) i ssue a wr i t or der or di r ect i on

¶12

i n t he nat ur e t her eof t her eby di r ect t he Addi t i onal Di st r i ct Judge No. 1, Al war t o deci de Ci vi l No. 35/ 2009 t i t l ed Raj ender Vs. Kaml esh Wi t hi n t he per i od t o be f i xed by t he Hon' bl e Cour t or di r ect t o deci de t he case at an ear l y dat e;

¶13

( i i ) any ot her or der or di r ect i on whi ch t he Hon' bl e Cour t deems f i t and pr oper by al so passed. ”

¶14

The br i ef f act s as emer gi ng on t he f ace of r ecor d ar e t hat t he r espondent s- pl ai nt i f f s had f i l ed a sui t on 20/ 07/ 2009 agai nst t he pet i t i oner - def endant , who i s t he owner of t he pr oper t y i n quest i on and t he sai d sui t has been f i l ed by t he r espondent s- pl ai nt i f f s f or r el i ef of speci f i c per f or mance of cont r act as wel l as per manent i nj unct i on. The sai d sui t i s pr esent l y pendi ng i n t he cour t of Addi t i onal Di st r i ct Judge No. 1, Al war

¶15

¶16

t i t l ed Raj ender Pr asad Gupt a Vs. Kaml esh Sachdeva bear i ng sui t No. 35/ 2009. I n t he sui t t he pet i t i oner has al r eady f i l ed her wr i t t en st at ement and i ssues have been f r amed on 03/ 12/ 2011 and t he pr esent case i f f i xed f or evi dence of r espondent s- pl ai nt i f f s si nce 08/ 02/ 2012 but f or one r eason or t he ot her , t he pl ai nt i f f i s avoi di ng t he compl et i on of evi dence.

¶17

I t i s al so submi t t ed t hat t he pet i t i oner i s t he owner of Pl ot No. 143A Ranj eet Nagar , Al war and t he same was l et out t o t he r espondent - pl ai nt i f f No. 1 f or a per i od of t wo year s on 06/ 09/ 2003. Af t er t wo year s, t he pet i t i oner went t o t ake back t he possessi on t hen t he pl ai nt i f f - r espondent her ei n st ar t ed abusi ng and mi sbehaved wi t h t he pet i t i oner . At one poi nt of t i me a set t l ement was al so ent er ed i n bet ween t he par t i es and t he pl ai nt i f f gave i n wr i t i ng t hat he wi l l handover t he pr emi ses t o t he pet i t i oner upt o 13/ 04/ 2006. Ther eaf t er , t he pl ai nt i f f f i l ed a ci vi l sui t f or i nj unct i on agai nst t he pet i t i oner and got t he not i ces i ssued on wr ong addr ess of t he pet i t i oner . The pet i t i oner got an or der on 24/ 03/ 2009 f r om Ci vi l Judge, J. D. Al war r est r ai ni ng t he pet i t i oner not t o di spossess t he pl ai nt i f f wi t hout due pr ocess of l aw. Ul t i mat el y, on 01/ 05/ 2009, t he pet i t i oner has f i l ed an appl i cat i on bear i ng No. 30/ 2009 f or evi ct i on bef or e t he Rent Tr i bunal , Al war agai nst t he r espondent - pl ai nt i f f but

¶18

¶19

t he pl ai nt i f f her ei n i s del ayi ng t he pr oceedi ng f or one r eason or t he ot her .

¶20

Counsel f or t he pet i t i oner cont ends t hat t he sui t was f i l ed i n t he year 2009 and dur i ng t he l ast mor e t han f i ve year s, t he pr oceedi ngs ar e at st and st i l l . On one pr et ext or ot her t he r espondent - pl ai nt i f f i s seeki ng t i me agai n and agai n. The di sput ed sui t pr oper t y i s r esi dent i al house and i t was l et out i n t he year 2003 whi l e t he pet i t i oner i s r esi di ng i n a t enant ed house. He si mpl y pl eads t hat t he mat t er deser ves t o be expedi t ed by t he Tr i al Cour t and t he sui t shoul d be di sposed of i n a l i mi t ed t i me f r ame.

¶21

I have consi der ed t he ar gument s advanced by t he l d. Counsel f or t he pet i t i oner , t he sui t i s pendi ng bef or e t he Tr i al Cour t si nce 2009 so t he mat t er deser ves t o be expedi t ed. I t i s not i ced on per usal of t he or der sheet pr oduced by t he counsel f or t he pet i t i oner t hat t he case i s bei ng adj our ned t i me and agai n.

¶22

I n vi ew of t he above f act s and ci r cumst ances and pecul i ar f act s par t i cul ar l y i n vi ew of t he f act t hat t he pet i t i oner i s a l ady and i t i s cl ai med t hat she i s r esi di ng i n t enant ed house, t he mat t er needs i ndul gence.

¶23

¶24

Accor di ngl y t he wr i t pet i t i on deser ves t o be al l owed and i s di sposed of wi t h t he di r ect i on t o t he Tr i al Cour t t o deci de t he mat t er expedi t i ousl y by t he end of t hi s year and no unnecessar y adj our nment on mer e aski ng shoul d be gr ant ed.

¶25

S. Kumawat - 110

¶26

Cer t i f i cat e- Al l cor r ect i ons made i n t he j udgment / or der have been i ncor por at ed i n t he j udgment / or der bei ng e- mai l ed.

¶27

S. Kumawat Jr . P. A

Smt Kamlesh Sachdeva v. Rajender Prasad Gupta Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Kamlesh Sachdeva v. Rajender Prasad Gupta Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Kumar Meena Vs State Revenu Departmentors

Balu Ram Vs Smt Bholi Devi and Ors.

Benu Joshi Vs Gopal Singh Chauhan

Smt Geeta Devi Vs Sampat Badhara and Ors.

Smt Deepika Sharma Vs Smt Sushial and Ors.

Smt Meena Vs Hakimuddin and Ors.