Petitioner argued the matter was already decided, rendering the petition infructuous. The court allowed the submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1161/ 2015
Dimple Bagaria-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Anr.-Respondents
Date of Order-: : -24th March, 2015
Hon ' ble Ms. Ju st ice Bela M. Tr iv edi
Mr. Pradeep Kalwania, for petitioner/ s. Mr. Dhruv Rathore for
Mr. Anurag Sharma, AAG, for respondent/ s.
It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the result has already been declared after filing of the present petition, and therefore the present petition has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, the present petition
is dismissed as having become infructuous. By this order, the stay application also stands dismissed.
( Bela M. Tr ivedi) J.
R.Vaishnav 138.
“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” Ramesh Vaishnav-Personal Assistant
Dimple Bagaria
State of Rajasthan
Bela M. Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
