Allowed

Smt Vimla Devi v. Ramavatar Meena

Rajasthan HC20 Jan 2015CTA/83/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan allowed S. Civil Transfer Application No. 83/2014. The Court transferred a pending matrimonial restitution case from the Low Court Family Court Ajmer to the Low Court Family Court Dausa, citing the difficulty faced by the petitioner-resident woman in travelling for proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The application is allowed; the matter is transferred from the Low Court Family Court Ajmer to the Low Court Family Court Dausa.

Smt Vimla Devi Vs Ramavatar Meena — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR

¶3

S. B. Ci vi l Tr ansf er Appl i cat i on No. 83/ 2014

¶4

Smt . Vi ml a Devi Vs. Ramavat ar Meena

¶5

Dat e of Or der : 20/ 01/ 2015

¶6

HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE J. K. RANKA

¶7

Mr . Raj neesh Gupt a, f or t he pet i t i oner . Mr . Raj esh Chat ur vedi , f or t he r espondent .

¶8

Thi s t r ansf er appl i cat i on has been f i l ed by t he pet i t i oner who happens t o be wi f e of t he r espondent - pl ai nt i f f Shr i Ramavat ar Meena.

¶9

I t i s st at ed by counsel f or t he pet i t i oner t hat t he pet i t i oner i s r esi di ng at Kol wa, i n a vi l l age Dhanwad, Di st r i ct Dausa wher eas t he r espondent has f i l ed a pet i t i on bef or e t he l d. Fami l y Cour t Aj mer f or r est i t ut i on of conj ugal r i ght s and i t woul d be di f f i cul t f or her t o appear bef or e t he l d. Fami l y Cour t Aj mer on sever al occasi ons and t her ef or e, she bei ng a l ady deser ves i ndul gence of t hi s Cour t t o t r ansf er t he case f r om l d. Fami l y Cour t Aj mer t o l d. Fami l y Cour t Dausa. He al so cont ends t hat t hough t he addr ess of t he r espondent husband has been shown as r esi dent of Dausa but mer el y t o har ass t he pet i t i oner , t he addr ess i s now bei ng shown of Madanganj , Di st r i ct Aj mer .

¶10

On t he cont r ar y, l d. Counsel f or t he r espondent cont ended t hat t he r espondent had been t hr eat ened by t he f ami l y member s of t he pet i t i oner and he i s r esi di ng i n Madanganj , Di st r i ct Aj mer . He f ur t her cont ended t hat t he pet i t i oner bei ng a l ady, i s al so a

¶11

¶12

Gover nment ser vant wor ki ng at Jai sal mer and Aj mer i s near er t o Jai sal mer t han Dausa.

¶13

I have consi der ed t he ar gument s advanced by t he counsel f or t he par t i es and per used t he aver ment s made i n t he t r ansf er appl i cat i on and i n my vi ew, t he pet i t i oner bei ng a l ady and r esi dent at Kol wa, i n a vi l l age Dhanwad, Di st r i ct Dausa, t hough she mi ght be wor ki ng as cl ai med by t he counsel f or t he r espondent but i t woul d cer t ai nl y be di f f i cul t f or her t o appear and t o pur sue t he mat t er pendi ng bef or e t he l d. Fami l y cour t Aj mer . Bal ance of conveni ence al so l i es i n f avour of t he l ady pet i t i oner who has t o t r avel t o Aj mer al one and even may be wi t h f ami l y member s, put t i ng al l i n an i nconveni ent si t uat i on.

¶14

Accor di ngl y, i n my vi ew, t he mat t er deser ves i ndul gence and accor di ngl y t he appl i cat i on i s al l owed, mat t er i s t r ansf er ed f r om l d. Fami l y Cour t Aj mer t o l d. Fami l y Cour t Dausa. I or der accor di ngl y.

¶15

Let t he l d. Fami l y Cour t Aj mer t r ansf er t he case t i t l e as Ramavat ar Meena Vs. Smt . Vi ml a Devi bear i ng No. 38/ 2014 t o t he l d. Fami l y Cour t Dausa.

¶16

Bot h t he Counsel submi t s t hat t hi s Cour t may f i x t he dat e f or appear ance bef or e t he l d. Fami l y Cour t Dausa and accor di ngl y par t i es may appear on 07/ 02/ 2015 bef or e t he l d. Fami l y Cour t Dausa, who may r egul at e pr oceedi ngs t her eaf t er .

¶17

Accor di ngl y, t hi s t r ansf er appl i cat i on st ands di sposed of . ( J. K. RANKA) J.

¶18

S. Kumawat - 18

¶19

Cer t i f i cat e- Al l cor r ect i ons made i n t he j udgment / or der have been i ncor por at ed i n t he j udgment / or der bei ng e- mai l ed.

¶20

S. Kumawat Jr . P. A

Smt Vimla Devi v. Ramavatar Meena

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Vimla Devi v. Ramavatar Meena

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Nidhi Vs Manish

Shri Rustam Vs Smt Radha Hemnani and Anr.

Sh Shanti Lal Prajapat Vs Sh Suresh Kumar Prajapat Ors.

Smt Anita Vs Padam Kumar Jaliya

Ratan Devi Vs Kailash Bhinda andORS

Man Singh and Another Vs Kailash and Others