The High Court, Jaipur Bench disposed of a civil transfer petition filed by the petitioner. The court held that the District Court had correctly rejected the petition with cogent reasons, and dismissed the same.
The transfer petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed in entirety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR
S. B. Ci vi l Tr ansf er Pet i t i on No. 114/ 2014
Man Si ngh & Or s. Vs. Kai l ash & Anr .
Dat e of Or der : 20/ 01/ 2015
HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE J. K. RANKA
Mr . Raj Kumar Goyal , f or t he pet i t i oner .
Thi s t r ansf er pet i t i on has been f i l ed by t he pet i t i oner seeki ng t r ansf er of t he mat t er pendi ng bef or e t he Addi t i onal Ci vi l Judge ( Jr . DI V. ) No. 2, Bhar at put l evel l i ng al l egat i ons agai nst l d. Addi t i onal ci vi l Judge ( Jr . DI V) No. 2 Bhar at pur t o any ot her Cour t i n Bhar at pur .
I t i s cl ai med by counsel f or t he pet i t i oner t hat t he l d. Di st r i ct Judge di d not consi der t he var i ous gr ounds of seeki ng t r ansf er of t he mat t er and i n par t i cul ar i t was cl ai med t hat t he r espondent No. 2 Meenu S/ o Lat e Hazar i Lal appear s t o be wor ki ng as a pr i vat e Sweeper at t he r esi dence of t he Pr esi di ng Of f i cer of t he l ear ned t r i al cour t and he i s under i nf l uence of def endant s/ r espondent s.
I have consi der ed t he ar gument s advanced by t he counsel f or t he pet i t i oner and have per used t he mat er i al as al so t he or der of t he l d. Di st r i ct Judge and i n my vi ew, t he Di st r i ct Cour t has r i ght l y r ej ect ed t he t r ansf er pet i t i on wi t h t he cogent r easons. Needl ess t o ment i on, t he Tr i al Cour t i s bound t o deci de t he sui t pendi ng bef or e i t i n accor dance wi t h l aw.
2
Accor di ngl y, I do not f i nd any mer i t i n t he t r ansf er pet i t i on and t he same i s accor di ngl y di smi ssed.
S. Kumawat - 18
Cer t i f i cat e- Al l cor r ect i ons made i n t he j udgment / or der have been i ncor por at ed i n t he j udgment / or der bei ng e- mai l ed.
S. Kumawat Jr . P. A
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer petition seeking transfer of a civil suit pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Jr. Division to another court in Bharatpur is meritorious.
Man Singh & Ors.
Kailash & Anr.
J. K. Ranka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
