Kailash Chandra and Anr. v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The case pertains to an appeal challenging the validity of a criminal proceeding. High court evaluates whether an earlier sentence is binding or needs reconsideration during the hearing before the appellate court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� व�व�ध सज� स�गन प���न�-पत स�ख�� 617/2015 अन�ग एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� अप�ल स�ख�� 582/2015
1
र�जस��न उच न����ल� , ज!धप"र
:: आ द श$ ::
एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� व�व�ध सज� स�गन प���न�-पत स�ख�� 617/2015 अन�ग एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� अप�ल स�ख�� 582/2015
(क&ल�श चन( � अन� बन�म र�जस��न र�ज�)
आदश ददन�$ �क :
03.7.2015
:: उपवस�� ::
म�नन�� न����वधपव� श� महन( म�ह$ श �र�$
प��0/अप�ल��0गण क$ अवध�क� श� व�न� ज&न, ल!क अव3�!जक श� द�पक च�धर�।
�!ग� अव33�षक प��0/अप�ल��0गण ए�� �!ग� ल!क अव3�!जक क! प��0/अप�ल��0 क7 ओर ध�र� 389 दण: पद;�� स�वह�� क$ अन�ग � पस�"� सज� स�गन प���न�-पत पर द!न< पक< क$ �क� स"न$ ए�� क�न>न� � �थ��तमक वस�व� पर व�च�र दक�� ग��।
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence recorded at a previous sitting of the trial court should be maintained during the appellate proceedings.
Whether the lower court impugned order shall be taken into consideration in light of subsequent criminal proceedings.
What relief is available when the petitioner challenges the appellate proceedings against a specific criminal judgment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
राजसूदन उच्च न्यायालय
- respondent
तोश बिनबम राजसूदन राजू (भारत)
Coram
मनीष नायवधivas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLAB/617/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court