Bhanwar Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge considers Article 21 and Section 23 EIC Act, referencing precedents on bail and evidence, and upholds prior sentence order while noting procedural gaps.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's bail application dismissed. Sentence order upheld.
What the court decided
एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� व�व�ध सज� स�गन प���न�-पत स�ख�� 374/2015 अन�ग एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� अप�ल स�ख�� 362/2015
1
र�जस��न उच न����ल� , ज!धप"र
:: आ द श$ ::
एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� व�व�ध सज� स�गन प���न�-पत स�ख�� 374/2015 अन�ग एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� अप�ल स�ख�� 362/2015
(भ � रल�ल बन�म र�जस��न र�ज�)
आदश ददन�$ �क :
02.7.2015
:: उपवस�� ::
म�नन�� न����वधपव� श� महन- म�ह$ श �र�$
प��//अप�ल��/ क$ अवध�क� श� फज�नद अल�, ल!क अवभ�!जक श� द�पक च�धर�।
�!ग� अवभभ�षक प��//अप�ल��/ ए�� �!ग� ल!क अवभ�!जक क! प��//अप�ल��/ क5 ओर ध�र� 389 दण8 पद9�� स�वह�� क$ अन�ग पस�"� सज� स�गन प���न�-पत पर द!न: पक: क$ �क� स"न$ ए�� क�न<न� � �थ��तमक वस�व� पर व�च�र दक�� ग��।
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the evidence test under Section 23 EIC Act was correctly applied.
Whether sentence recorded in order dated 15.4.2015 was sustained.
Whether bail application was entertained properly.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
स jahr
Coram
ज्ञ.एन.शाम
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLAB/374/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court