This order allowed a miscellaneous application seeking a one-month extension of time to file a requisite undertaking before the Trial Court for vacating demised property, extending the deadline to 31.03.2015.
Time period to file requisite undertaking extended to 31.03.2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 35/2015. IN S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.253/2014. Legal Representatives of Ram Jeevan S/o Thanji Vs. Legal Representatives of Gopal Krishan S/o late Balkishan & Ors. .. Judgment dated 03.03.2015
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR.
:: O R D E R ::
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 35/2015. IN S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.253/2014.
Legal Representatives of Ram Jeevan S/o Thanji Vs. Legal Representatives of Gopal Krishan S/o late Balkishan & Ors.
Date of Order :::: 3rd March, 2015.
P R E S E N T
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
Appearance:
Mr. Sushil Solanki, for the applicants/defendants.
<<>>
BY THE COURT :
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 35/2015. IN S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.253/2014. Legal Representatives of Ram Jeevan S/o Thanji Vs. Legal Representatives of Gopal Krishan S/o late Balkishan & Ors.
Judgment dated 03.03.2015
2/2
the present miscellaneous application on 18.02.2015 seeking enlargement of time by one month, as the requisite undertaking could not be filed by them within the stipulated time granted by this Court and is said to have been filed by them on 22.12.2014 before the learned Trial Court and the learned Trial Court is said to have refused to take the said undertaking on record by its order dated 07.02.2015 as filed beyond the given time .
(Dr. VINEET KOTHARI), J.
/Mohan/
/ S-73 /
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the time limit for filing the requisite undertaking prior to vacating demised property should be extended.
Legal Representatives of Ram Jeevan S/o Thanji
Legal Representatives of Gopal Krishan S/o late Balkishan & Ors.
VINEET KOTHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
