The High Court in a first appeal dismissed the bank's appeal seeking pendent lite and future interest. The court held that the trial court correctly refused interest at contractual rates after considering the material on file.
The first appeal filed by the appellant-Bank seeking award of pendent lite and future interest is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.45/1992 Punjab National Bank Vs. Ram Niwas S/o Mathuralal Lohiya & Anr. Order dated 12/03/2015.
1of 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
::: O R D E R :::
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.45/1992
Punjab National Bank
Vs.
Ram Niwas S/o Mathuralal Lohiya & Anr.
Date of Order: 12/03/2015.
P R E S E N T
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
Appearance:
None present for the appellant/plaintiff. Mr. Nitin Trivedi, for the respondents/defendants.
BY THE COURT:
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.45/1992 Punjab National Bank Vs. Ram Niwas S/o Mathuralal Lohiya & Anr. Order dated 12/03/2015.
2of 4
appellant/plaintiff, against the respondents/defendants for recovery of Rs.16,230/- although was decreed in favour of plaintiffBank, which was claimed on the basis of a pro-note executed in favour of plaintiff-Bank, however, the appellant/plaintiff-Bank has filed the present first appeal for future relief of pendentelite and future interest, which was not awarded by the learned trial court.
इस व���दक क� ब�र� म� प�.ड. 1 प�खर�ज न� जजरह म� स��क�र ककय� ह� कक प�न�ट द न��क 1.4.75 क� तहत नक रकम क�ई पतत�� $गण क� नह$� $ गई। प र)-2 सट�टम�ट ऑफ एक�उ�ट स� भ� यह ज�दहर ह�त� ह� कक द न��क 1.4.75 क� पतत�� $गण क� �� $ ब/क द�र� प�न�ट क1 रकम 10 हज�र रपय� अ � नह$� क1 गई। इस पक�र यह प4ण)तय� स�बबत ह� कक प�म�सर$ न�ट द न��क 1.4.75 बबल�ब ल ह� कक जजसस� कक व���दक स� .1 क� तनण)य �� $ क� व�रद ककय� ज�त� ह�।
व���दक स . 2
इस व���दक क� ब�र� म� �� $ क� ग��ह प�.ड.3 म�गतर�म न� अपन� बय�न म� कथन ककय� ह� कक प र)-15 ल�टर ऑफ ग�र�ट$ प�र� म�र� ह�थ स� भर� ह�आ ह�। ए स� ब� हसत�कर श� रपल�ल न� म�र� स�मन� ककय� थ�। रपल�ल न� जम�नत नर�न= आईल ममल क� मलय� $ थ�। स� स� ड� म�र� � ई स� एफ म�न�जर श� प�र$ क� हसत�कर ह�। जजरह म� इस ग��ह न� कथन ककय� ह� कक प र)-15 ग�र�ट$ क� मलय� भर��य� गय� थ�। प र)-15 इसमलय� भर��य� गय� थ� कक ग�र�ट$ 4सर$ ल$ गई थ�। प र)-14 � प र)-15 क� ब�र� म� ल�न� क� 4सर$ ग�र�ट$ प�र करन� क� मलय� पत मलख� गय�। इसक� व�पर$त पतत�� $गण क1 ओर स� इस व���दक क�
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.45/1992 Punjab National Bank Vs. Ram Niwas S/o Mathuralal Lohiya & Anr.
Order dated 12/03/2015.
3of 4
ब�र� म� क�ई स�कय उपलबC नह$� ह� कक जजसस� प� . ड .-3 ग��ह म�गतर�म क� बय�नD पर व�श�स नह$� करन� क� म�र� समक क�ई ज�यज क�रण नह$� ह�। पररण�मत: यह व���दक �� $ क� पक म� तय ककय� ज�त� ह�।
अन�त�ष:-
व���दक स�.-2, 4 क� तनण)य �� $ क� पक म� उपर�क पक�र स� कर द य� ज�न� पर �� $ क� यह ��� ��सत� 16227/- र. व�रद पतत�� $ स�. 1 � 2 मय खर�) म�क म� तथ� मय बय�ज बररह 6% पततरत पतत�ष) त�र$ख �यर$ ��� स� त� �स4ल$ रकम डडक1 ककय� ज�न� य�गय प�य� ज�त� ह� तथ� पतत�� $ स�.3 क� व�रद �� $ क� यह ��� ख�ररज ककय� ज�न� य�गय प�य� ज�त� ह�।
आ �र
पररण�मस�रप ��� �� $ बहक �� $ खखल�फ पतत�� $ न�.-1 � 2 स�य�क रप स� � पNथकत: ब�बत �स�ल$ रकम 16,227/- र मय खर�) म�क म� � मय बय�ज बररह 6% पततरत पतत�ष) क1 रस� त�र$ख �यर$ ��� स� त� �स4ल$ रकम डडक1 ककय� ज�त� ह�। �� $ ब/क अपन� प�स पतत�� $ स�.-1 द�र� ह�ईप�थथक�ट�ड ककय� गय� म�ल क� व�कय कर�कर डडक1 क1 रकम �स4ल करन� क� भ� अथCक�र$ ह�ग�। पतत�� $ न�.-3 क� व�रद ��� �� $ ख�ररज ककय� ज�त� ह�। पर�) डडक1 तनयम�न�स�र बन�य� ज���।
Sd/(म�त� $न रम�) अपर जजल� नय�य�C�र, भ�ल��ड�।"
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.45/1992 Punjab National Bank Vs. Ram Niwas S/o Mathuralal Lohiya & Anr. Order dated 12/03/2015.
learned court below, this court is satisfied that the learned trial court after considering the entire material placed before it has rightly refused to grant pendentelite and future interest at contratual rates. No interference in the same is required.
(Dr. VINEET KOTHARI), J.
DJ/H-8
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court rightly refused to grant pendent lite and future interest at contractual rates in a suit for recovery.
Whether the first appeal by the plaintiff-Bank for modification of the decree on interest deserves interference.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Punjab National Bank
Ram Niwas S/o Mathuralal Lohiya
VINEET KOTHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
