The High Court at Jaipur disposed of a civil contempt petition as infructuous based on the Respondent's statement that compliance with a prior interim order had been made.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; Notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
O R D E R IN
S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.536/2015
IN S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.10586/2012 (Bal Singh Meena Vs. Atul Garg)
Date of Order : 03.09.2015
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Mr. Himanshu Jain on behalf of Mr. Ajatshatru Mina, for the petitioner. Mr. Inderjeet Singh, AAG for the respondent.
BY THE COURT
Mr. Inderjeet Singh, AAG appearing for the
respondent states that compliance as warranted under the order dated 14.11.2013 has been made and the petition has become infructuous.
On the statement of the learned AAG, the contempt petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Notices discharged.
(ALOK SHARMA), J
MS/-73
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.- Manoj Solanki, P.A.
Ajatshatru Mina
Atul Garg
Allok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
