High Court Bench at Jaipur dismissed an application where the detenue was recovered and produced before the Court per a previous order. The Court scheduled a hearing in the post-lunch session to record the detenue's statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
DB Habeas Corpus Petition No.272/2014
Date of Order :: 17/12/2014
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. RANKA
Mr. Achintya Kaushik, for the petitioner. Ms. Meenaxi Pareek, DGC, for the State
A mention was made in the morning that the detenue has been recovered and with the consent of the parties, the matter has come up on board in the complementary cause list today.
In compliance of order of the Court dt.10/12/2014, the detenue has been produced before the Court and before we proceed to take note of her wishes, it will be appropriate that let her statement be recorded by the Dy. Registrar (Judl.) and be placed for perusal of the Court in the post lunch session.
Office to proceed.
[J.K. RANKA],J.
[AJAY RASTOGI],J.
Raghu/p.1/
2
Certificate:All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being e-mailed. Raghu, Sr. PA.
Petitioner
State
Ajay Rastogi
J.K. Ranka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
