Allowed

Kamlsh Kumar Mewara v. State Panchayati Raj Dep Anr.

Rajasthan HC17 Dec 2014CW/8671/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order relies on a prior Division Bench judgment declaring illegal the distinction between weightage for degree holders and experience for specific recruitment posts via placement agencies. The petition allows the benefit of said judgment.

What did the court decide?

The petition is disposed of in the same terms as the referred Division Bench judgment, and the petitioner is granted mutual benefits.

Kamlsh Kumar Mewara Vs State Panchayati… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2014)

¶1

CW P-8 6 7 1 / 1 4

¶2

( 1 )

¶3

I n The Hi gh Cour t of Judi cat ur e f or Raj ast han Jai pur Bench, Jai pur O R D E R D. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 8671/ 2014

¶4

Dat e : 17/ 12/ 2014

¶5

Hon' bl e Mr . Just i ce Aj ay Rast ogi Hon' bl e Mr . Just i ce J. K. Ranka

¶6

Mr . Tanveer Ahmed Adv. , f or pet i t i oner . Mr . Gaur av Tanwar Adv. on behal f of Mr . S. K. Gupt a AAG, f or r espondent .

¶7

Counsel f or t he par t i es j oi nt l y submi t s t hat t he quest i on whi ch has been r ai sed i n t he i nst ant pet i t i on has been exami ned & deci ded by t he Di vi si on Bench bef or e t he Mai n Seat at Jodhpur i n bunch of pet i t i ons vi de j udgment dt . 30. 07. 2013 r epor t ed i n 2013( 4) RLW 3451( Raj . ) and obser ved as under : -

¶8

“ The wr i t pet i t i ons, i n vi ew of t he di scussi on made, deser ve accept ance, t hus, ar e al l owed. The di st i nct i on made f or gr ant of wei ght age agai nst exper i ence ear ned by t he per sons empl oyed on t he post s of Juni or Techni cal Assi st ant ( J. T. A. ) , Juni or Engi neer , Gr am Rozgar Sahayak, Dat a Ent r y Oper at or , Comput er Oper at or wi t h Machi ne, Lekha Sahayak, Lower Di vi si on Cl er k, Coor di nat or I EC, Coor di nat or Tr ai ni ng and Coor di nat or Super vi si on t hr ough pl acement agenci es i n MGNREGA or any ot her scheme of Depar t ment of Rur al Devel opment and Panchayat i Raj on basi s of t he mode of t hei r engagement under pr ovi so 2nd t o Rul e 273 of t he Rul es of 1996 i s decl ar ed i l l egal .

¶9

As a consequent t o t he decl ar at i on above t he pr ovi so second t o Rul e 273 of t he Raj ast han Panchayat i Raj Rul es, 1996 st ands as under : - Pr ovi ded al so t hat i n case of appoi nt ment t o t he post of Lower Di vi si on Cl er k,

¶10

CW P-8 6 7 1 / 1 4

¶11

( 2 )

¶12

mer i t shal l be pr epar ed by t he Appoi nt i ng Aut hor i t y on t he basi s of such wei ght age as may be speci f i ed by t he St at e Gover nment f or t he mar ks obt ai ned i n Seni or Secondar y or i t s equi val ent exami nat i on and such mar ks as may be speci f i ed by t he St at e Gover nment havi ng r egar d t o t he l engt h of exper i ence exceedi ng on year acqui r ed by per sons engaged on t he post of Juni or Techni cal Assi st ant ( J. T. A. ) , Juni or Engi neer , Gr am Rozgar Sahayak, Dat a Ent r y Oper at or , Comput er Oper at or wi t h Machi ne, Lekha Sahayak, Lower Di vi si on Cl er k, Coor di nat or I EC, Coor di nat or Tr ai ni ng, Coor di nat or Super vi si on i n MGNREGA or i n any ot her scheme of t he Depar t ment of Rur al Devel opment and Panchayat i Raj i n t he St at e.

¶13

I n l i ght of t he pr ovi so second t he r espondent s ar e r equi r ed t o ext end t he wei ght age agai nst t he exper i ence t o t he per sons empl oyed t hr ough t he pl acement agenci es al so.

¶14

No or der as t o cost s. ”

¶15

I n t he l i ght of t he j udgment r ef er r ed t o supr a and i n t he same t er ms, t he pr esent pet i t i on i s accor di ngl y di sposed of and t he pet i t i oner i s al so ent i t l ed f or t he same benef i t s mut at i s mut andi s gr ant ed by t he Di vi si on Bench i n t he j udgment r ef er r ed t o supr a.

¶16

( J. K. Ranka) , J. ( Aj ay Rast ogi ) , J.

¶17

VS/

¶18

Certificate - All corrections have been incorporated in the judgment/ order being emailed/ Vijay Singh Shekhawat/ PAJW

Kamlsh Kumar Mewara v. State Panchayati Raj Dep Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamlsh Kumar Mewara v. State Panchayati Raj Dep Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Raj and Anr. Vs Smt Rekha Devi Sharma

State of Raj and Ors. Vs Dr Arun Kumar Tyagi and Ors.

State of Raj and Anr. Vs Govind Gupta and Anr.

M/S Punsumi Engneers Ltd. Vs C I T-I Jaipur and Another

Kailash Chand Vs State Home Departmentors

Radhesy Shyam Shuklabas Vs State of Raj Ors.