Sharwan Kumar v. R S R T C and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This brief order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner informed the Court that the respondents had conceded the prayed relief.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
O R D E R
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.992/2004 Sharwan Kumar Vs. The R.S.R.T.C. And Anr.
Date of Order
:::: 06.05.2014
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Mr.Dinesh Yadav, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Bhati, for the respondents.
Learned counsel Mr.Dinesh Yadav appearing on behalf of the petitioner, under the instructions, informs this Court that the relief as prayed for has already been extended by the respondents and, therefore, the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made, the writ application is dismissed for having become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sharwan Kumar
- respondent
The R.S.R.T.C. and Anr.
Coram
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/992/2004
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court