Allowed

Bajrang Lal v. State Home Departmentors

Rajasthan HC24 Nov 2014CW/12691/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed this writ petition for parole. Recognizing the petitioner's satisfactory jail conduct as a precondition for regular parole deemed the conduct reports and allowed first regular parole of 20 days. The police adverse report was not a bar in the absence of tangible evidence against him.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted first regular parole of 20 days on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- and one surety, subject to reporting to the police station every Sunday and surrendering back to jail upon expiry

Bajrang Lal Vs State Home Departmentors — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2014)

¶1

D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.12691/2014 Bajrang Lal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

¶2

( 1 )

¶3

I n The Hi gh Cour t of Judi cat ur e f or Raj ast han Jai pur Bench, Jai pur O R D E R D. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on ( Par ol e) No. 12691/ 2014 Baj r ang Lal Vs. St at e of Raj . & Or s.

¶4

Dat e : 24. 11. 2014

¶5

Hon' bl e Mr . Just i ce Aj ay Rast ogi Hon' bl e Mr . Just i ce Veer endr Si ngh Si r adhana

¶6

Mr . Anshuman Saxena Adv. , f or pet i t i oner . Mr . B. N. Sandu, GA- cum- AAG, f or r espondent .

¶7

The convi ct - pet i t i oner Baj r ang Lal S/ o Mangi Lal has pr ef er r ed i nst ant pet i t i on u/ R 9 of Raj ast han Pr i soner s Rel ease on Par ol e Rul es, 1958 f or gr ant of f i r st r egul ar par ol e of 20 days.

¶8

The pet i t i oner on bei ng convi ct ed by t he l ear ned t r i al Judge i s ser vi ng l i f e sent ence at Di st r i ct Jai l , Jhal awar and t he DB Cr i mi nal Appeal whi ch he pr ef er r ed agai nst hi s convi ct i on & sent ence awar ded by t he l ear ned t r i al Judge i s pendi ng i n t hi s Cour t .

¶9

Counsel f or pet i t i oner submi t s t hat t he pet i t i oner bei ng el i gi bl e f or seeki ng f i r st r egul ar par ol e of 20 days submi t t ed appl i cat i on u/ R 9 of t he Rul es, 1958 and t he pol i ce r epor t i s adver se and t hat appear s t o be pr epar ed i n a mechani cal manner and t her e i s no t angi bl e evi dence on r ecor d i n suppor t t her eof , however , soci al wel f ar e depar t ment r ecommended f or gr ant of f i r st par ol e and j ai l conduct of t he pet i t i oner as per nomi nal r ol l i ssued f r om of f i ce of Dy. Super i nt endent , Di st r i ct Jai l , Jhal awar i s sat i sf act or y.

¶10

Af t er consi der i ng t he submi ssi ons made by

¶11

D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.12691/2014 Bajrang Lal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

¶12

( 2 )

¶13

counsel f or t he par t i es and t he f act t hat conduct of convi ct - pet i t i oner i n j ai l i s sat i sf act or y whi ch i s t he pr e- condi t i on cont empl at ed u/ R 9 of t he Rul es, 1958 and i n t he f act s & ci r cumst ances, we consi der i t appr opr i at e t o gr ant t he convi ct - pet i t i oner t he benef i t of f i r st r egul ar par ol e t o whi ch he i s ent i t l ed f or under t he Scheme of Rul es, 1958.

¶14

Consequent l y, wr i t pet i t i on st ands al l owed and r ecommendat i ons of t he commi t t ee i n i t s meet i ng hel d on 03. 06. 2014 qua pet i t i oner st ands quashed. The Dy. Super i nt endent , Di st r i ct Jai l , Jhal awar i s di r ect ed t o r el ease pet i t i oner ( Baj r ang Lal S/ o Mangi Lal ) on f i r st par ol e, i f not avai l ed of , f or 20 days i ncl udi ng days of j our ney t o home & back f r om t he dat e of hi s r el ease on f ur ni shi ng hi s per sonal bond besi des one sur et y of Rs. 25, 000/ - t o t he sat i sf act i on of j ai l aut hor i t y wi t h t he st i pul at i on t hat he shal l sur r ender hi msel f and r et ur n back t o t he j ai l aut hor i t y on expi r y of 20 days ( supr a) t o be not i f i ed by j ai l aut hor i t y and shal l mai nt ai n peace & t r anqui l i t y dur i ng par ol e per i od and i n addi t i on t o i t he shal l f ur t her

¶15

r epor t dur i ng par ol e on each Sunday at 11 am at concer ned pol i ce st at i on and t hat r epor t be f ur ni shed t o t he j ai l aut hor i t y. I n case of f ai l ur e t o sur r ender by pet i t i oner on st i pul at ed dat e, t he j ai l aut hor i t y shal l pr oceed i n accor dance wi t h l aw. A copy of t hi s or der be sent t o t he pet i t i oner

¶16

D.B. Civil Writ Petition (Parole) No.12691/2014 Bajrang Lal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

¶17

( 3 )

¶18

t hr ough j ai l aut hor i t y f or compl i ance. No cost s.

¶19

( Veer endr Si ngh Si r adhana) , J ( Aj ay Rast ogi ) , J

¶20

VS Shekhawat/ -PA/ p.3 12691cw14Nov24FnlDsps(D40).sxw Certificate - All corrections have been incorporated in the judgment/ order being emailed/ Vijay Singh Shekhawat/ PAJW

Bajrang Lal v. State Home Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajrang Lal v. State Home Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pavan Kumar Rawat Vs State Animal and Husbsndry Depors

Vicky Kumar Vs U O I and Ors.

Surendra Singh Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Union of India and Ors. Vs Gajendra Kumar Sharma and Ors.

State of Raj and Ors. Vs Braj Mohan Gochar

Ali Mohammed Vs State Home Departmentors