The High Court of Rajasthan extended the implementation of a selection scale order and noted that no case for interim protection was made. The stay application was consequently rejected.
Stay application rejected. Order passed noting implementation of earlier order and restoration of selection scale.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I n The Hi gh Cour t of Judi cat ur e f or Raj ast han Jai pur Bench, Jai pur O R D E R
D. B. Ci vi l Mi sc. St ay Appl i cat i on No. 14633/ 2011 I n D. B. Ci vi l Speci al Appeal ( Wr i t ) No. 2136/ 2011
Dat e : 24/ 11/ 2014 Hon' bl e Mr . Just i ce Aj ay Rast ogi Hon' bl e Mr . Just i ce Veer endr Si ngh Si r adhana
Mr . Ashi sh Shar ma Adv. , f or appel l ant .
I t has been i nf or med t hat or der of t he l ear ned Si ngl e Judge has al r eady been i mpl ement ed and sel ect i on scal e i n t er ms of or der of t he l ear ned
Si ngl e Judge has been r est or ed back t o t he r espondent .
Taki ng not e t her eof no case f or i nt er i m
pr ot ect i on pr ayed f or i s made out .
Accor di ngl y, t he st ay appl i cat i on st ands r ej ect ed. Of f i ce t o pr oceed.
( Veer endr Si ngh Si r adhana) , J ( Aj ay Rast ogi ) , J
VS/ - (D13) Certificate - All corrections have been incorporated in the judgment/ order being emailed/ Vijay Singh Shekhawat/ PAJW
Appellant
Respondent
Ajay Rastogi
Veerendra Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
