The single-judge bench relied on a recent decision in Ramdhankumawat and disposed of the instant writ petition and a stay application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11078/ 2014
Pramod Kumar Jangir vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Date of Order : 08.12.2014
HON ' BLE MS. JUSTI CE BELA M. TRI VEDI
Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, counsel for petitioner.
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment delivered by the Court in the case of Ram dh an Ku m aw at vs. St at e of Raj ast h an & An r . [ S.B.Civ il W r it Pet it ion No.10 6 2 2 / 2 0 1 4 , decided on 1 8 .1 1 .2 0 1 4 ] , and the petition be disposed of accordingly.
In view of the said submission, the present petition stands disposed of in the light of aforesaid decision. By this order, the stay application also stands disposed of.
( BELA M. TRI VEDI ) ,J.
Mohit M/ 39
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed. Mohit Tak, P.A.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ram dh an Ku m aw at vs. St at e of Raj ast h an & An r . [ S.B.Civ il W r it Pet it ion No.10 6 2 2 / 2 0 1 4 , decided on 1 8 .1 1 .2 0 1 4 ]Referred¶8
Pramod Kumar Jangir
State of Rajasthan
BELA M. TRI VEDI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
