Dalip Singh Yadav v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR…
COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH O R D E R
S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PET. NO. 381/2013 S.B.CR.MISC. STAY APPL. NO.345/2013 (Dalip Singh Vs. State of Raj. and ors.)
DATE OF ORDER :::::
02.04.2014
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
None present, for the petitioner/s. Mr.R.Raghav, Public Prosecutor for State.
None is present for the petitioner.
I have heard learned Public Prosecutor for the State, perused the contents of the petition, as also gone through the impugned order passed by the court below.
I do not think it just and proper to interfere with the impugned order, hence this petition is dismissed.
However, a liberty is given to the petitioner to file a fresh petition within a period of one month from today, if he so desires.
Stay application also stands dismissed.
(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.
Sandeep/-34
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being e-mailed. SANDEEP RAWAT,Sr.P.A.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the impugned order passed by the court below.
Dalip Singh
State of Raj.
Mahesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court