Radhe Shyam v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a lease cancellation appeal, the Single Bench revised juvenile sentence, quashing conviction under JJ Act and maintaining bail after finding insufficient evidence for sexual assault charge under section 3(1)(x).
What did the court decide?
Conviction and fine under Juvenile Justice Act 2000 quashed; sentence extended and reiterating bail order; order remanded to VDP for execution.
What the court decided
एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� अप�ल स�ख�� 474/1994 (र�ध�श��म बन�म र�जस��न र�ज�)
1
र�जस!"�न!!उच!&!!न!(�(�ल(!,!ज+धप.र। --::!आ!द4!श!::-र�ध4श(�म !!!बन�म र�जस��न र�ज� एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� अप�ल स�ख�� 474/1994 * * * * * आद4श!ददन�9क!! :! ! 15 मई , 2014 -: उपसस"त!:म�नन�� न����धधपतA श� मह�नD म�ह�श Eर�
अप�ल��F क� अधधEक� श� रम�श पIरJहहA, लJक अभM�Jजक श� एल.आर.उप�ध���।
- न ����ल� द�र� : �ह अप�ल वEद�न वEभशष न����ध�श, अनIसUधVA
ज�तA/अनIसUधVA जनज�तA (अ.तन.प.), पA�पगढ द�र� वEभशष स�श�स पकरण स�ख�� 96/1992 म[ प�ररA तनण]� हदन��ककA 26 अगसA, 1994 क� वEरद पसAIA कa गई हb, जजसक� AहA वEद�न वEभशष न����ध�श न� अप�ल��F र�ध�श��म कJ अनIसUधVA ज�तA/अनIसUधVA जनज�तA (अ.तन.) अधधतन�म, 1989 कa ध�र� 3(1)(x) एE� M�रA�� दणe स�हहA� कa ध�र� 341 – 323 क� अपर�ध क� आरJप म[ दJषभसद कर ध�र� 3(1) (x) क� अपर�ध क� भलए 6 म�ह क� स�ध�रण क�र�E�स E 200/रपए अ�]दणe, अदम अद��ग� अ�]दणe एक म�ह क�
एकल प�ठ फ�जद�र� अप�ल स�ख�� 474/1994 (र�ध�श��म बन�म र�जस��न र�ज�)
2
स�ध�रण क�र�E�स A�� ध�र� 341 M�.द�.स�. क� अपर�ध क� भलए 15 हदन क� स�ध�रण क�र�E�स E ध�र� 323 M�.द�.स�. क� अपर�ध क� भलए 6 म�ह क� स�ध�रण क�र�E�स स� दजणeA कक��।
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether Section 3(1)(x) of JJ Act 2000 applied given insufficient evidence of sexual assault or molestation.
Whether future offences were foreseeable to justify extending detention beyond statutory term.
Whether accused met time limit for execution of term of sentence.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajesham Banm Rajaswan Raj
- respondent
Rajesham Banm Rajaswan Raj
- other
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/474/1994
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court