Court dismissed a civil contempt petition as infructuous after counsel accepted that the impugned order dated 27.03.2012 was complied with. All notices were discharged.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
O R D E R IN
S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.982/2012 IN
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2261/2012 (Ramji Lal Yadav & Anr. Vs. Dr. Purushottam Agarwal & Anr.)
Date of Order : 10.11.2014
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Mr. Pradeep Singh, for the petitioners. Mr. Abhinav Sharma, AAG for the respondents. BY THE COURT
Counsel for the petitioners states that the present contempt petition has become infructuous as the order passed by
this Court on 27.03.2012 has been complied with.
In view of statement made, the contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. Notices discharged.
(ALOK SHARMA), J
MS/-
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.- Manoj Solanki, P.A.
Ramji Lal Yadav & Anr.
Dr. Purushottam Agarwal & Anr.
Allok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
