This court dismissed a contempt petition as infructuous because the impugned order had been recalled by the Single Judge on 3.11.2014.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan
at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur
ORDER
SB Civil Contempt Petition No.1017/2014
Ranu Yadav v. Shri Anup Shanar Bhttacharya &
Anr.
Date of Order: 13.11.2014
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
None present for the petitioner
Mr.S.M Mehta, Sr. Advocate with
Mr.R. Saklechaappear for the respondents
contemnors
Mr. S.M Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R.
Saklecha, counsel appearing for the respondents
state that the order dated 16.7.2014 of which
contempt is alleged has since been recalled by
the learned Single Judge on an application
therefor vide order dated 3.11.2014. He submits
that in this view of the matter the contempt
petition has become infructuous.
None appears for the petitioner.
In view of the statement made, the
contempt petition is accordingly dismissed as
infructuous.
(ALOK SHARMA), J
Sharma NK
“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been
incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”
NK Sharma, Sr.P.A
Ranu Yadav
Shri Anup Shanar Bhttacharya
Anr.
Alok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court