In this single-paragraph order, the Single Judge dismissed the Civil Contempt Petition as having become infructuous following an admission by the petitioner's counsel, discharging the notices. No legal principle was established.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
O R D E R IN
S.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1005/2011 IN
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.16055/2010 (Shri Arvind Singh Vs. Shri Manjeet Singh & Ors.)
Date of Order : 23.09.2014
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Mr. S.K. Singodiya, for the petitioner. Mr. Hemant Taylor, for the respondents. BY THE COURT
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the contempt petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Notices discharged.
(ALOK SHARMA), J
MS/-
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.- Manoj Solanki, P.A.
Arvind Singh
Manjeet Singh & Ors.
Allok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
