Disposed

Kalla Ram Meena Anr. v. State Education Departmentors

Rajasthan HC4 Apr 2013CW/5256/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge disposed of the writ petition granting the petitioner liberty to make a representation to the respondents to reconsider their case in light of the judgment in Naresh Kumar Sharma, subject to the outcome of a pending appeal and availability of posts.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to make a representation to respondents to consider the petitioner's case in light of the Naresh Kumar Sharma judgment within one month, subject to post availability and pending appeal outcome

Kalla Ram Meena Anr. Vs State Education Departmentors — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5256/2013

¶3

Kalla Ram Meena & Anr.

¶4

Versus

¶5

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

¶6

DATE OF ORDER : 04/04/2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI

¶7

Mr. Ram Pratap Saini, for petitioner/s

¶8

¶9

Learned counsel submits that issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma & Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. ( SBCWP No.3414/2009 & 3 other connected petitions, decided on 20.09.2011 ). The aforesaid decision was given after hearing both the parties, thus petitioner/s may be given liberty to make a representation to respondents to consider his/their case in the light of the judgment aforesaid.

¶10

In view of the prayer made, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. If any representation is made, respondents are directed to look into the same and if case of petitioner/s is covered by the judgment in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma (supra), his/their case may also be considered in the light of the directions given in the judgment aforesaid subject to other eligibility and the merit. It may be in his/their category. Consideration aforesaid may be made within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order and representation.

¶11

The consideration would, however, be made to the extent of posts advertised and not filled. The order passed in this case would remain subject to final outcome of the appeal as it is recently informed that an appeal has been preferred in the case supra, thus petitioner/s has/have agreed to abide the final outcome of the appeal. Accordingly, if judgment in the case supra is reversed, then this order would be rendered ineffective.

¶12

[M.N.BHANDARI], J.

¶13

Certificate:

¶14

FRBOHRA/5256CWP2013.doc

¶15

“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” FATEH RAJ BOHRA, P.A.

Kalla Ram Meena Anr. v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalla Ram Meena Anr. v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishan Singh Vs Additional District Judge F T

Mahesh Chand Upadhayay Vs R.H.B. and Ors.

Gobre Lal Vs MD Kota Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas

Usha Ameta and Ors. Vs State Panchyati Raj Dep Anr.

Bheewa Ram Jat Vs State Education Departmentors

Smt Parveen Qureshi Vs State of Raj and Ors.