Petitioner sought withdrawal of petition challenging FIR with liberty to represent to Investigating Officer. Court dismissed petition but granted liberty to make representation; stay application also dismissed.
Liberty to make representation to Investigating Officer regarding allegations granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.3954/2012
Jagdish Prasad
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Anr.
DATE OF ORDER : 09/01/2013
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI
Mr. Anoop Dhand, for petitioner Mr. Laxman Meena, Public Prosecutor
Learned Counsel for petitioner wants to withdraw this petition for challenge of FIR with liberty to make a representation to the Investigating Officer indicating his bonafide in regard to purchase of land.
In view of prayer made, while petition is dismissed, liberty
as prayed for is granted to the petitioner to make a representation to the Investigating Officer regarding allegation made against him. Stay application is also dismissed.
[M.N.BHANDARI], J.
FRBOHRA/3954CMP2012.doc
Certificate:
“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”
FATEH RAJ BOHRA, P.A.
Jagdish Prasad
State of Rajasthan
M.N. BHANDARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
