The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the VAT revision petition relying on a prior order, Hinger Traders, holding the matter covered by precedent without detailed examination.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
: O R D E R :
S.B. CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.250/2013
Commercial Taxes Officer, Bhilwara.
vs. M/s Super Telecom Limited, Bhilwara.
Date of Order
::
02.12.2013
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Mr. D.K. Godara on behalf of Mr. V.K. Mathur, for the petitioner.
BY THE COURT:
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the controversy involved in the present revision petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court passed in S.B. Civil (VAT) Revision No.160/2012 : Commercial Taxes Officer v. M/s. Hinger Traders, decided on 16.09.2013.
In view of the submissions made and for the reasons recorded in the said order dated 16.09.2013, the revision petition is dismissed.
(ARUN BHANSALI), J.
A.K. Chouhan/
25
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commercial Taxes Officer v. M/s. Hinger TradersReferred¶13
S.B. Civil (VAT) Revision No.160/2012 : Commercial Taxes Officer v. M/s. Hinger Traders
Commercial Taxes Officer, Bhilwara
M/s Super Telecom Limited, Bhilwara
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
