U.O.I. v. U.I.T.Udaipur
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant appealed against rejection of injunction application against land auction. Court held appeal infructuous as auction was cancelled due to bidder's default. Trial court observations on injunction do not affect outcome.
What did the court decide?
No costs. Any observations on trial court rejection shall not affect final outcome of appellant's proceedings.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
: J U D G M E N T :
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1027/2012
Union of India
(Department of Post & Telegraph), Sri Ganganagar
Vs.
U.I.T., Sri Ganganagar.
Date of Order
22nd February, 2013
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Mr. Ankur Mathur for Mr. V.K. Mathur, for the appellant. Mr. Dron Kaushik, for the respondent.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal regarding injunction against auction proceedings is maintainable given that the auction has been cancelled.
Whether the application challenging the auction injunction remains live after the proceedings became frustrated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Union of India
- respondent
U.I.T.
Coram
Arun Bhansali
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/1027/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court