Appellant relied on a prior order to argue that the points raised in the appeal were already covered. The Court dismissed the miscellaneous appeal and disposed of the stay application.
The miscellaneous appeal stood dismissed; the stay application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
O R D E R
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1637 of 2009
Union of India through General Manager, NW Railway, Jaipur
VERSUS
Smt. Nathi Devi wife of late Shri Mool Chand Kumawat and Others \
Date of Order :::: March 5th , 2010
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dalip Singh
Mr. G.C. Garg, Counsel for the appellant
By the Court :
Learned counsel the appellant fairly submitted that the points raised in this miscellaneous appeal are squarely covered by the order of this Court passed in S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.4386 of 2009 (Union of India Vs. Mayank Modi), decided on 03.02.2010.
In view of the said order, the present miscellaneous appeal stands dismissed.
The stay application also stands disposed of.
(Dalip Singh), J.
ashok/
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.4386 of 2009 (Union of India Vs. Mayank Modi), decided on 03.02.2010Followed¶12
Union of India through General Manager, NW Railway, Jaipur
Smt. Nathi Devi wife of late Shri Mool Chand Kumawat and Others
Dalip Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
