U.B.Mathur v. I.T.D.C.Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed a writ petition challenging the non-grant of promotion due to non-availability of vacancies, holding that promotion requires vacant posts and following departmental rules.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR.
O R D E R
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.731/1995.
: :
Vs.
India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
: :
Date of Order 3.3.2009
HON'BLE MR.JUSTI CE MOHAMMAD RAFI Q
Ms. Snehlata Sharma for Mr. P.K.Sharma for the petitioners. Mr. Vinendra Agarwal for the respondents.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
- This writ petition has been filed by five petitioners
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether promotion is mandatory as a matter of right without the availability of vacancies.
Whether the arbitrary denial of promotion violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.K.Sharma & Ors.
- respondent
India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.
Coram
Mohammad Rafi Q
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/731/1995
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court