Partly allowed

Kota Open University, Kota. v. the Judge Labour Court, Kota.

Rajasthan HC3 Mar 2009CW/1172/1995

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held that while the direct success award for temporary termination is maintained regardless of appointment nature, the direction for 50% back wages is set aside as inapplicable to a daily wage employee engaged initially for a short period. Reinstatement with continuity of service remains upheld.

What did the court decide?

Award modified: Reinstatement with continuity of service maintained; direction for 50% back wages set aside.

Kota Open University, Kota. Vs the Judge… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2009)

¶1

SBCWP No. 1172/ 95.

¶2

¶3

I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

¶4

BENCH AT JAI PUR.

¶5

O R D E R

¶6

S. B. CI VI L WRI T PETI TI ON No. 1172/ 1995.

¶7

Kot a Open Uni ver si t y, Kot a. Vs.

¶8

The Judge Labour Cour t , Kot a & Or s.

¶9

Dat e of Or der : - Mar ch 03, 2009.

¶10

HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE MOHAMMAD RAFI Q

¶11

Shr i P. V. Cal l a f or t he pet i t i oner . Shr i Vi shwanat h Kar an f or

¶12

Shr i Raj i v Bandhu f or t he r espondent s.

¶13

¶14

BY THE COURT: -

¶15

Thi s wr i t pet i t i on has been f i l ed by t he pet i t i oner agai nst t he awar d passed by t he Judge Labour Cour t , Kot a dat ed 13/ 6/ 1994 by whi ch t he t er mi nat i on of t he r espondent was hel d i l l egal and he was hel d ent i t l ed f or r ei nst at ement wi t h cont i nui t y of wages and 50% back- wages.

¶16

Lear ned counsel appear i ng f or t he

¶17

r espondent s has i nf or med t he cour t t hat r espondent s r ei nst at ed t he ser vi ces of t he pet i t i oner pur suant t o t he awar d dat ed on 24/ 10/ 1994 and subsequent l y he has been r egul ar i sed and has been gi ven r egul ar scal e of pay on 14/ 5/ 1998 and subsequent has al so been conf i r med vi de or der dat ed 17/ 6/ 2000.

¶18

SBCWP No. 1172/ 95.

¶19

¶20

Lear ned counsel f or t he pet i t i oner i n vi ew of t he subsequent devel opment submi t s t hat even t hen t he awar d t o t he ext ent of 50% back wages cannot be mai nt ai ned because nat ur e of appoi nt ment of t he pet i t i oner was onl y on dai l y wage basi s and t hat he was engaged i ni t i al l y f or a per i od of t hr ee mont hs and i t was i n t hese f act s, awar d was passed.

¶21

Havi ng r egar d t o t he f act s of t he case, t he awar d t o t he ext ent of al l ot her aspect s i . e. r ei nst at ement wi t h cont i nui t y i n ser vi ce i s mai nt ai ned but t he di r ect i on wi t h r egar d t o payment of 50% back wages f or t he per i od f r om t he dat e of t er mi nat i on dat ed 30/ 3/ 1989 t i l l passi ng of t he or der dat ed 13/ 6/ 1994 i s set - asi de.

¶22

( MOHAMMAD RAFI Q) J.

¶23

ani l

Kota Open University, Kota. v. the Judge Labour Court, Kota.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kota Open University, Kota. v. the Judge Labour Court, Kota.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramdev Naurya Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Brij Kishore Gupta Vs Raj State Ganganagar Sugar Mil

Gokul Chand Pareek Vs the Chairman R S R T C Jaipur

Prahlad Rai Swami Vs M.C,Jhunjhunu

U.B.Mathur Vs I.T.D.C.Ltd.

Gaya Parsad Vs Exicutive Officer,Munici.Board Dholpur