The petitioner has preferred this writ petition to challenge the action of the respondents for insisting deposition of enhanced licence fee from 1.12.2004. Leanred counsel for the petitioner, at the first instance, submitted that there was no contract between the parties from the year, 2004 onwards. Thus, enhanced licence fee could not be demanded by the respondents. On referring Annexure7, where the prayer of the petitioner is for renewal of contract, learned counsel fairly conceded that the earlier contract was continued between the parties, thus his first argument should not be accepted or be considered and looking to the fact that in the original agreement, there was clause for arbitration, petitioner may be given liberty to approach the arbitrator for the dispute in regard to the demand of enhanced licence fee by the respondents w.e.f.