Application dismissed for want of prosecution as neither party appeared and the applicant was seemingly not interested in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.222 TA-862-2023 Date of Decision: 10.02.2026
NANDINI
....Applicant
Versus
ROHIT SINGH
....Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present: None.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
There is no representation on behalf of the applicant as well as
the respondent.
Seemingly, the applicant is not interested to pursue with the present application.
Hence, the same is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
10.02.2026
Preeti S.
| (ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE |
||
|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : | Yes/No |
| Whether reportable | : | Yes/No |
PREETI 2026.02.13 11:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nandini
Rohit Singh
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
