The court dismissed the application as withdrawn upon the applicant's counsel indicating no desire to pursue the matter, granting liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.109
TA-612-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.02.2026
KAMALJIT KAUR
....Applicant
Versus
KULDEEP SINGH
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Rhythem Bajaj, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Yogeshpal Singh, Advocate for the respondent.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
At this stage, counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to pursue with the present application and the same be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh, with better particulars.
Ordered accordingly.
(ARCHANA PURI) 09.02.2026 JUDGE
Sonu Saini
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No
SONU 2026.02.10 09:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
KAMALJIT KAUR
KULDEEP SINGH
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
