Second appeal disposed of by reference to the detailed order of even date passed in a connected matter, Daya Singh and others v. Faridabad Complex Administration. Pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-2549-1995 (O&M) Decided on : 28.04.2026
FARIDABAD COMPLEX ADMINISTRATION, FARIDABAD
..Appellants
Versus
KHAJJAN SINGH
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Padam Kant Dwivedi, Advocate and Ms. Anshu Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Shreya Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate for sole respondent.
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.
Administration, Faridabad” .
disposed of.
28.04.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub/Sahil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
MOHD AYUB 2026.04.29 17:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
Faridabad Complex Administration, Faridabad
Khajjan Singh
Sudeepti Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
