A single-judge oral order where the appellants were absent. The court relied on a prior decision (RFA No. 2320/1998) allowing appeals by landowners and dismissed the present appeal accordingly.
The appeal is disposed of in the same terms as RFA No. 2320 of 1998.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
121
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RFA No. 2418 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.02.2026
Raj Kumar and another
...Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Present: None for the appellants.
Mr. Abhinash Jain, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent.
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, learned couns e l for the respondent-State of Haryana s ubmits that the present appe a l is squarely covered by the decision d ated 23.07.2024 passed by th i s Court in RFA No. 2320 of 1998 , titl e d “Smt. Priyanka W/O Ish Kumar & Ors Versus LAC PWD (IB), Ambala.” , whereby the appe a ls filed by the landowner(s) for the s a me notification / purpose / village, was allowed, while dismissin g the appeal(s) filed by the Stat e of Haryana. [2] Despite the case having be e n called twice/thrice, no one appears o n behalf of the appellant(s). [3] After going through the j udgment passed in Smt. Priyanka’s case (supra) as well as t h e present case, this Court agrees wi t h the assertion of the learned c ounsel for the respondent. [4] Consequently, the present appeal is disposed off in the same ter m s as Smt. Priyanka’s case (supra) .
DINESH KUMAR 2026.02.24 19:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
���������������������������
-2-
[5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall
stand(s) disposed off.
| February 23, 2026 ‘dk kamra’ |
( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|
| ������������������������������ | ���� | ��� |
| ��������������������� | ���� | ��� |
DINESH KUMAR 2026.02.24 19:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Smt. Priyanka W/O Ish Kumar & Ors. versus LAC PWD (IB), AmbalaFollowed¶2
RFA No. 2320 of 1998
Raj Kumar
another
State of Haryana
Harkesh Manuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
