Babu Ram v. Hy.State
Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh | RFA-1583-2000 (O&M) | Babu Ram v. State of Haryana | Coram: Harkesh Manuja, J. (single judge, oral) | Decided 20.02.2026 | One-line cross-reference order: 'For orders, see RFA-1582-2000, tilted as Nirmal Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana', decided vide order of even date; no independent reasoning, statutes or quantum in this file. Landowner-side counsel (Bhag Singh, Lekh Raj Nandal, Arvinder Arora, Govind Arora) suggests a land-acquisition compensation appeal against the State (inferred from the counsel designation 'for the landowner').
What did the court decide?
The Court recorded no independent findings and directed that, for orders in the present appeal, reference is to be made to its companion judgment in RFA-1582-2000 (Nirmal Singh and others v. State of Haryana), decided vide order of even date.