Disposed¶20

Uco Bank and Others v. Hardayal Sidhu

Punjab & Haryana HC6 Jul 2026INCOMP/1334/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

UCO Bank versus Hardayal Sidhu; INCOMP-1334-2026; Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh; incomplete petition pending with Registry; objections not cleared; Rule 9 Chapter I Part-A Volume V Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders; 40 days re-filing; consigned to record room; liberty to file fresh petition; Harsimran Singh Sethi J; Amarinder Singh Grewal J; disposed of; non-reportable.

What did the court decide?

Petition consigned to the record room; liberty reserved to file a fresh petition in case any grievance still subsists. ¶20

Uco Bank and Others Vs Hardayal Sidhu — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

INCOMP-1334-2026

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

(163) INCOMP-1334-2026 Date of Decision : 06.07.2026

UCO Bank

...Appellant

Versus

Hardayal Sidhu

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL

¶11

Present: None.

¶12

¶13

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)

¶14

Present petition was filed in the year 2020 wherein, objections were raised by the Registry and thereafter, no one has bothered to clear the said objection and the incomplete petition is still pending with the Registry of this Court and the same has been listed so as to weed out the same as the petition is consuming limited space available.

¶15

As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. The same was not taken back for re-filing too after the removal of objections and the case is listed before the Court for orders.

¶16

SHUBHAM 2026.07.08 13:06 I am the author of this document

¶17

INCOMP-1334-2026

¶18

-2-

¶19

Keeping in view the fact that no one has come forward to clear the objections raised by the Registry so as to get the petition listed despite the fact that due notice was published in the cause list for the information of the respective counsel to clear the objection in the cases which are lying pending with the Registry, the petition needs no consideration for passing any order and the same be consigned to the record room. In case any grievance still subsist, liberty is granted to file fresh one.

¶20

4. Disposed of.

¶21

(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE

¶22

(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE

¶23

July 06, 2026 Shubham

¶24

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No

¶25

SHUBHAM 2026.07.08 13:06 I am the author of this document

Uco Bank and Others v. Hardayal Sidhu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uco Bank and Others v. Hardayal Sidhu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baljeet Kaur Vs Punsup and Others

Punjab Agro Industries Corporation Limited Vs Chander Shekhar Pathak and Others

Jitender Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others

Dharmender Vs State of Haryana and Others

Kamlesh Kumari Vs Union of India and Others

Punjab State Civil Supplies Corp. Ltd. Vs Adarsh Kumar