Disposed¶21

Vikram v. Balwan Singh and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC1 May 2026INCOMP/1032/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Administrative/procedural closure of an incomplete petition (INCOMP) under Rule 9, Chapter I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders: failure to take back and refile within 40 days of Registry objections (raised 23.1.2026) and non-response to the Registry notice of 20.3.2026 concerning cases lying in the Objection Counter of the DRR Branch; matter listed in the urgent list; no representation for the petitioner; no further order passed and file consigned to the records. Parties: Vikram (petitioner) v. Balwan and another (respondents). Bench: Nidhi Gupta J. (oral order). Search terms: INCOMP, incomplete petition, objection counter, DRR Branch, refiling, 40 days, urgent list, file consigned to records.

What did the court decide?

None; the file was consigned to the records. ¶21

Vikram Vs Balwan Singh and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

INCOMP No.1032-2026 (O & M) 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

116

¶4

INCOMP No. 1032 of 2026 DIARY No.10657145 Date of decision :-01.05.2026

Vikram

…..Petitioner

Versus

Balwan and another

¶9

…..Respondents

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

¶11

Present:None.

¶12

NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)

¶13

The aforesaid petition was filed on 20.1.2026 by Mr. Pankaj A ttri, Advocate. However, certai n objections were raised by the Regis t ry on 23.1.2026.

¶14

As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Pa r t-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orde r s, the petition, on which objection s have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the coun s el party, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However , the same was not taken back f or refiling after removal of objection s . On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. F o llowing note was displayed/p u blished by the Registry in the cause l ist and website of this Hon'ble C ourt on 20.3.2026:-

¶15

"All the Advocates /P arties are requested to collect the cases as m e ntioned in the list attached below which are lyin g pending in the Objection

¶16

VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

INCOMP No.1032-2026 (O & M) 2

¶18

Counter of DRR Bra n ch and not taken back till today, within one month of the date of publication of this notice, failing which all the cases (except the Caveat Applications) will be listed before Hon'ble Court on ju d icial side for appropriate orders."

¶19

Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocat e to collect his case for re- fi ling after rectification of objection s , the needful was not done. C o nsequently, the matter has been list e d before this Court in urgent lis t today.

¶20

There is no representation o n behalf of the petitioner.

¶21

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts of the matter, no further o r der is required to be passed. T he file be consigned to the

¶22

records.

¶23

May 01, 2 026 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE

¶24

Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No

¶25

VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Vikram v. Balwan Singh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram v. Balwan Singh and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahender Mangla Vs Sanjay Kumar

Baljit Kaur @ Vicky Kaur Nagra Vs Amarjit Singh Nagra and Another

Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority and Others Vs Jai Kishan

Sunita Vs Raghav Thukral and Others

Raj Rani Vs Hem Lata

Raj Rani Vs Hem Lata