Disposed¶21

Sunita v. Raghav Thukral and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC1 May 2026INCOMP/1027/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sunit v. Raghav Thukral and another, INCOMP No. 1027 of 2026 (O&M), P&H High Court, Chandigarh, decided 01.05.2026, Nidhi Gupta J. (Oral). Non-refiling of petition after Registry objections dated 24.1.2026; Rule 9, Chapter I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders (re-file within 40 days); Registry notice published 20.3.2026; matter listed in urgent list; Present: None / no representation for petitioner; no further order passed; file consigned to the records. No merits adjudication, no quantum, no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Keeping in view the facts (non-refiling after objections, published notice, no representation), no further order is required to be passed in the matter. ¶21

Sunita Vs Raghav Thukral and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

INCOMP No.1027-2026 (O & M) 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

115

¶4

INCOMP No. 1027 of 2026 DIARY No.10660623 Date of decision :-01.05.2026

Sunit

…..Petitioner

Versus

Raghav Thukral and another

¶9

…..Respondents

¶10

CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

¶11

Present:None.

¶12

NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)

¶13

The aforesaid petition was filed on 22.1.2026 by Ms. Sheena K hanna, Advocate. However, ce r tain objections were raised by the R e gistry on 24.1.2026.

¶14

As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Pa r t-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orde r s, the petition, on which objection s have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the coun s el party, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However , the same was not taken back f or refiling after removal of objection s . On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. F o llowing note was displayed/p u blished by the Registry in the cause l ist and website of this Hon'ble C ourt on 20.3.2026 :-

¶15

"All the Advocates /P arties are requested to collect the cases as m e ntioned in the list attached below which are lyin g pending in the Objection Counter of DRR Bra n ch and not taken back till

¶16

VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶17

INCOMP No.1027-2026 (O & M) 2

¶18

today, within one month of the date of publication of this notice, failing which all the cases (except the Caveat Applications) will be listed before Hon'ble Court on ju d icial side for appropriate orders."

¶19

Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocat e to collect his case for re- fi ling after rectification of objection s , the needful was not done. C o nsequently, the matter has been list e d before this Court in urgent lis t today.

¶20

There is no representation o n behalf of the petitioner.

¶21

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts of the matter, no further o r der is required to be passed. T he file be consigned to the

¶22

records.

¶23

Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No

¶24

VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.01 18.02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sunita v. Raghav Thukral and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita v. Raghav Thukral and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahender Mangla Vs Sanjay Kumar

Baljit Kaur @ Vicky Kaur Nagra Vs Amarjit Singh Nagra and Another

Estate Officer Haryana Urban Development Authority and Others Vs Jai Kishan

Vikram Vs Balwan Singh and Others

Raj Rani Vs Hem Lata

Raj Rani Vs Hem Lata