A 2009 first appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant, unserved and having sold his house and left the address on record, did not appear despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
226
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-3320-2009 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.02.2026
Beant Singh ... Appellant(s)
Versus
Sukhwinder Singh & Ors ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the appellant.
Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for
Mr. Ravinder Arora, Advocate for respondent No.4.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
stand disposed off.
10.02.2026
( ALKA SARIN )
Yogesh Sharma JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2026.02.11 10:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. Chandigarh
Beant Singh
Sukhwinder Singh
Respondent No.4
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
