A one-line disposal order with no substantive decision of general application; the revision petition was disposed of in terms of respondent counsel's statement with liberty to revive.
Revision petition disposed in terms of statement made by counsel for respondent No.1 on 05.02.2026, with liberty to revive if anything survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
118
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-1236-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision : 10.02.2026
HARBANT SINGH .... Petitioner
VERSUS
THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD AND ANR .... Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Brijeshwar Singh Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for respondent No.1.
Service of respondent No.2 dispensed with vide order dated 20.03.2025.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
10.02.2026 (ALKA SARIN) Aman Jain JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes/No
AMAN JAIN 2026.02.11 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Harbant Singh
The Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd
Respondent No.2
Alka Sarin
Aman Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
