The single-judge oral order dismissed an appeal filed by Rupal Kaur for want of prosecution after the appellants failed to appear and failed to comply with a previous order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
212
FAO-2395-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 01.04.2026
Rupal Kaur and Another …..Appellants Vs.
Sh. Harnek Singh and Others .….Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:None for the appellants.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
There is no representa�on on behalf of the appellants.
Even the previous order has not been complied with.
Appellants has not provided the copy of the award of the Tribunal so as to re-construct the file.
It appears that appellants are no longer interested in pursuing
the present appeal.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
(DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE April 01, 2026 Nee�ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.04.01 17:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Rupal Kaur
Harnek Singh
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
