Disposed¶23

Neeraj Jain v. Vaishali Singh, Administrator Hsvp and Anr.

Punjab & Haryana HC27 Mar 2026COCP/592/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh; COCP-592-2026; 2026:PHHC:048477; contempt of courts; Section 12 Contempt of Courts Act 1971; disobedience/non-compliance of writ order dated 01.12.2025 in CWP-35495-2025; representation dated 18.11.2025; HSVP Gurugram; Administrator, HSVP, Gurugram order dated 25.03.2026 rejecting representation; compliance report affidavit of Estate Officer-II Ms. Anupma Malik; cost of Rs. 10,000 paid per order dated 09.03.2026; petition withdrawn as infructuous with liberty to assail order dated 25.03.2026; Neeraj Jain v. Smt. Vaishali Singh; Deepak Gupta, J.; decision date 27.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition (as rendered infructuous) with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 25.03.2026. ¶23

Neeraj Jain Vs Vaishali Singh, Administrator Hsvp… — Contempt of Court | Punjab & Haryana HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Permission to withdraw the petition (as rendered infructuous) with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 25.03.2026.

¶23

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents complied with the direction in the Court's order dated 01.12.2025 in CWP-35495-2025 to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 18.11.2025, such that they were liable to be punished under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

¶17

Court's answer

The compliance report (affidavit of Ms. Anupma Malik, Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Gurugram) together with the order dated 25.03.2026 of the Administrator, HSVP, Gurugram, is taken on record.

¶18

Ratio / Principle

The present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 25.03.2026.

¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

COCP-592-2026 (High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh; decision 27.03.2026): Contempt petition by Neeraj Jain under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against Smt. Vaishali Singh and another for alleged disobedience of the Court's order dated 01.12.2025 passed in CWP-35495-2025 (Annexure P1), which had directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 18.11.2025. Counsel for the respondents placed on record a compliance report — affidavit of Ms. Anupma Malik, Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Gurugram — along with order dated 25.03.2026 passed by the Administrator, HSVP, Gurugram, showing that the representation had been decided and the order dated 01.12.2025 complied with; the cost of Rs. 10,000 imposed by order dated 09.03.2026 had already been paid. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition had thereby been rendered infructuous and sought withdrawal with liberty to challenge the order dated 25.03.2026 rejecting the representation. The Court took the compliance report on record and disposed of the petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 25.03.2026. (DEEPAK GUPTA, J., Oral; speaking/reasoned: yes; reportable: no.)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

¶3

COCP-592-2026 Date of decision: 27.03.2026

Neeraj Jain

. . . . Petitioner

Vs.

Smt. Vaishali Singh and another

¶8

. . . . Respondents

¶9

¶10

CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

¶11

¶12

Present: - Mr.Nishant Maini, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶13

Mr.Parminder Sandhu, Advocate, and Mr.Harmanjyot Singh Gill, Advocate, for the respondents.

¶14

¶15

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

¶16

Cost of �10,000/- has already been paid by the respondents in compliance of the order dated 09.03.2026.

¶17

This petition was filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for punishing the respondents for disobeying the order dated 01.12.2025 passed in CWP-35495-2025 (Annexure P1), whereby this Court had directed the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 18.11.2025.

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record compliance report by way of an affidavit of Ms. Anupma Malik, Estate Officer-II, HSVP, Gurugram, along with order dated 25.03.2026 passed by the Administrator, HSVP, Gurugram, submitting that the order dated 01.12.2025 (Annexure P1) has already been complied with, as the representation of the petitioner has been decided vide order dated 25.03.2026. Compliance report is taken on record.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the aforesaid circumstances, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and therefore, he be permitted to withdraw the same with liberty to challenge the order dated 25.03.2026, rejecting the representation.

¶20

VIVEK PAHWA 2026.03.27 16:41 I agree to specified portions of this document Chandigarh

¶21

COCP-592-2026

¶22

2026:PHHC:048477

¶23

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the present petition is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 25.03.2026.

¶24

(DEEPAK GUPTA) 27.03.2026 JUDGE �� Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No

¶25

VIVEK PAHWA 2026.03.27 16:41 I agree to specified portions of this document Chandigarh

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Neeraj Jain v. Vaishali Singh, Administrator Hsvp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neeraj Jain v. Vaishali Singh, Administrator Hsvp and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saroj Devi &Ors Vs Teja Ram and Ors.

Dilbagh Singh Vs Gurcharan Singh and Anr.

Prithi Singh and Others Vs Hari Ram

Paramjit Kaur Alias Rozy Vs Madhu Sharma and Another

Sukhdev Kaur etc. Vs Baljinder Kaur etc.

Santosh and Others Vs Joginder and Anr.