Appeal of 2018 dismissed for non-prosecution. Notice had been issued to the sole appellant, who was served per the service report, but no one appeared on his behalf when the matter was called twice. Pending applications were also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
261
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-2220-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : 11.02.2026
Sunil ... Appellant(s) Versus Bhola Ram and Ors. ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
11.02.2026 ( ALKA SARIN ) Ankur Goyal JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
ANKUR GOYAL 2026.02.12 09:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution where the duly served appellant does not appear despite the matter being called twice.
Sunil
Bhola Ram
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
