Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel for the petitioners pleaded no instructions; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[215] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-92 7 1-1999 (O&M) Date of D ecision : 10.07.2026
Pritam Si n gh and another …Petitioners
Versus
Superintending Cancal Officer, Ferozepu r Canal Ci r cle, Ferozepur and others ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: Mr. Rajesh Sachdeva, Advo c ate for Mr. C.M. Munjal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Harinder Pal Singh Isha r , Addl. AG, Punjab.
Mr. JPS Sandhu, Advocate f o r respondent Nos.3 & 4.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] Counsel for the petitioners p l eads no instructions.
[2] Dismissed for non-prosecuti o n.
[3] All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stan d s disposed o ff .
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
10.07.20 2 6
‘R. Sharma'
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.13 15:08 I agree to specified portions of this document
Pritam Singh
Superintending Cancal Officer, Ferozepur Canal Circle, Ferozepur
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
