The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging an order of the Election Tribunal as infructuous due to the efflux of time, as the petitioner's term had already expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[219] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-55 1 5-2008 (O&M) Date of D ecision : 10.07.2026
Arshad …Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Jub e da and others ….Respondents
Coram : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Pankaj Mulwani, Senior DAG, Haryana.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
[1] By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner assailed o r der (Annexu r e P-5) passed by the Election T r ibunal.
[2] The writ petition was admi t ted on 06.11.2008 and an interim order wa s passed in favour of the petition e r.
disposed o ff .
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
10.07.20 2 6
Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.07.13 16:47 I agree to specified portions of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the Election Tribunal order remains viable after the petitioner's term has expired?
Arshad
Smt. Jubeda and others
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
