Ehc Ramesh Chander v. State of Haryana and Others
Service law – Disciplinary penalty – Stoppage of five increments with permanent effect
Case brief
What is this about?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, CWP-9065-2020 (O&M), Ramesh Chander v. State of Haryana and others, decided 15.07.2026 by Justice Aman Chaudhary (oral). Keywords: stoppage of increments with permanent effect; parity with co-delinquent Krishan (warning vs penalty); Man Singh v. State of Haryana, 2008(3) SCT 364; reconsideration within six months; disposal on State counsel's undertaking; hearing and reasons before adverse order.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of on the strength of the State's undertaking to reconsider and decide the petitioner's case within six months in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the impugned orders and taking note of Man Singh (2008(3) SCT 364); benefit to be granted forthwith if the petitioner is found entitled, and any adverse order to be passed only after hearing and with reasons. ¶13