Writ petition dismissed at the outset on counsel's statement that it had been rendered infructuous. The court recorded no findings on the merits and decided nothing of substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
256
CWP-6616-2021 Date of decision : 20.07.2026
Sukhdev Kumar
...... Petitioner
versus
State of Punjab and others
...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate and Mr. Davinder Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Harpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
20.07.2026
Dinesh
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No
DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.23 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sukhdev Kumar
State of Punjab and others
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
