Petition to quash an order placing the petitioner under suspension was dismissed without adjudication, counsel having conceded that the statute provides an alternate appellate remedy; liberty was granted to pursue that appeal.
Liberty granted to avail alternate appellate remedy in accordance with law; no other relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
125
CWP-21572-2026 Date of Decision : 17.07.2026
Rajinder Prasad
...... Petitioner
versus
State of Haryana and another ...... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present: Mr. Sunil Sihag, Advocate for the petitioner.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)
4. Ordered accordingly.
(PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE
17.07.2026 Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable : No
DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.23 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should grant writ relief against an order placing the petitioner under suspension when counsel concedes a statutory appellate remedy exists.
Rajinder Prasad
State of Haryana
Pankaj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
